UCTrust Workgroup
Child pages
  • Meeting Notes - 2008-03-26 at UCSB

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Meeting Notes - 2008-03-26 at UCSB

(DRAFT in progress...) 

Attendees 

Arlene Allen, UCSB
Curtis Bray, UCD
Chet Burgess, UCOP
Dedra Chamberlin, UCB
Matt Elder, UCSD
Greg Fellin, UCM
Eric Goodman, UCSC
Karl Heins, UCOP
Steve Hock, UCR
Bruce James, UCOP
Mike Kennedy, UCR
Datta Mahabalagiri, UCLA
Jeff Mccullough, UCB
Chris Peters, UCI
Brian Roode, UCI
Heidi Schmidt, UCSF
Adam Stone, LBNL
Hampton Sublett, UCD
Andrew Tristan, UCR
David Walker, UCOP

Significant Campus Activities  

  • UCR
    • UCR recently brought AYSO up in production.  They plan a campus rollout in April.
    • The HR LMS is also in production.
  • UCB
    • UCB just certified for UCTrust.
    • They are working with Infosys to to implement Sun Identity Manager
  • LBNL
    • LBNL is working on completing their UCTrust certification.
  • UCSF
    • UCSF is working on an implementation of the Tivoli identity and access manager.
  • UCM
    • UCM uses Sun Identity Manager for most applications.
  • UCOP
    • UCOP has an IdP running, using Active Directory for authentication, and is ready to integrate with the HR LMS.
    • They are working on UCTrust certification.
  • UCR
    • UCR is working on two-factor authentication using SafeWord.  (Presentation later in the meeting.)
    • They are rolling Kerberos out for system administration.  It is provisioned from their identity management system.
  • UCI
    • AYSO is in production, as is the HR LMS.
    • They are reimplementing their identity and access management systems, which date back to the '90s ('80s?).  The new system will be developed locally.
    • UCI would like the ability to add student IDs to PPS.
      • So would everyone else.  This will be proposed to the ITLC.
      • There was also discussion of assigning UCnetIDs to students.  There are some issues with the business process that may preclude this.  UCSC and UCSB have "fuzzy" algorithms for uniquely identifying students that work pretty well (~30 mismatches/quarter for UCSB, 0.7%-0.9% for UCSC).
  • UCSB
    • UCSB is using the Sun JES identity suite and is hiring Sun to do the implementation.
  • UCSC
    • UCSC is using the Sun JES product, contracting Aegis for implementation.
      • They're managing only identities, not authentication.
    • The issue of implementing a single login has become a sticking point for them.  Many legacy applications don't want shared userids and passwords.  (Discussion later in the meeting.)
    •  
  • No labels