Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. In March of 2010, the UCTrust Work Group and the UC IT Policy and Security (UCITPS) proposed that the ITLC defer the UCTrust Basic requirement for periodic audits until an assessment of InCommon Silver could be made to determine its applicability to UCTrust Basic.
  2. Based on that assessment, the two groups will draft modifications to http://www.ucop.edu/irc/itlc/uctrust/trustpolicy032707.htmlUCTrust University of California Identity Management Federation Service Description and Policies as part of a proposal to the ITLC for the Integration of InCommon Silver into UCTrust. A draft implementation plan will also be presented as part of the proposal.  This implementation plan will include: deadlines for campus compliance with the modified certification and technical criteria, as well as service provider compliance with any modified technical criteria.

Documents

Gap Analysis

    • 4.2.1 Business, Policy, and Operational Factors
    • 4.2.2 Registration and Identity Proofing
    • 4.2.3 Digital Electronic Credential Technology
    • 4.2.4 Credential Issuance and Management
    • 4.2.5 Security and Management of Authentication Events
    • 4.2.6 Identity Information Management
    • 4.2.7 Identity Assertion Content
    • 4.2.8 Technical Environment

Reference Materials

  • ITPSUCTrust InCommon Silver final 042111.pProposed revision to [UCTrust University of California Identity Management Federation Service Description and Policies|http://www.ucop.edu/irc/itlc/uctrust/policy/trustpolicy032707.pdf]