Child pages
  • Update for ITLC - September 2011

Rationale/Purpose for InCommon Silver Certification Effort

  • InCommon Silver as replacement for UC Trust basic audit
  • Upcoming requirement for federated login to NIH Grant Submission, CILogon, National Student Clearinghouse

State of InCommon Silver Assurance in Higher Ed

  • CIC schools targeted second quarter of next year for certification attempt
  • InCommon managing an InterOp testing program with 3 IdPs (University of Florida, Virginia Tech, and UW-Milaukee) and 1 SP (CILogon) to provide implementation guidelines for campuses attempting certification

UC Resource Estimate Assumptions

  • For campuses who submitted hours estimates, the dollar estimates below are based on a rate of $80/hour.
  • Includes the cost of bringing existing systems into compliance with InCommon Silver. Assumes that existing account holders will not have to be re-credentialed
  • Covers the costs of InCommon Silver compliance for all campus members who might log in to AYSO (with the exception of UCLA, which includes students)
  • Estimates do not include the cost of engaging audit staff

Campus

Resource Estimate

Notes

LBNL

$64,000

 

UCB

$166,000

 

UCD

 

Pending

UCI

$80,000

Plus cost for two-factor

UCLA

$359,800

Includes students

UCM

 

Pending

UCOP

$47,000

Plus $14,000 annual

UCSB

$0

New system design includes InCommon Silver, no new resources

UCSC

$51,000 - $ 160,000

Range from optimistic to pessimistic

UCSD

$304,000 - $470,000

 

UCSF

$200,000

 

UCR

$96,000

 

Next Steps

  • Continue with plan to use InCommon Silver rather than UC Trust audit framework (continue "waiving" UC Trust Basic audit requirement for minimum one more year)
  • Await revised certification plan and guidelines due from InCommon in the next couple months
  • Review this revised plan at each campus and finalize resource requirements
  • ITLC as a group and at each campus will need to make determination on resource assignment and priority
  • All campuses should begin the process of documenting current practices using the InCommon Silver framework
  • Begin work to establish an audit framework that will make InCommon Silver audits as efficient as possible. The UC Trust workgroup recommended a multi-campus audit team be formed, with representation from internal audit from 3-5 campuses. Karl Heins volunteered to provide leadership and guidance to this group.

Proposed ITLC Action Items

  • Review InCommon Silver certification plans with your IAM lead and work with local campus constituents on resourcing the proposed implementation plans.
  • Work with UC Trust workgroup leadership to draft request to UC audit services to form a multi-campus review team.
  • No labels