Child pages
  • Update for ITLC - September 2011

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Campus

Resource Estimate

Notes

LBNL

$64,000

 

UCB

$166,000

 

UCD

 

Pending

UCI

$80,000

Plus cost for two-factor

UCLA

$359,800

Includes students

UCM

 

Pending

UCOP

$47,000

Plus $14,000 annual

UCSB

$0

New system design includes InCommon Silver, no new resources

UCSC

$51,000 - $ 160,000

Range from optimistic to pessimistic

UCSD

$304,000 - $470,000

 

UCSF

$200,000

 

UCR

$96,000

 

Recommendations

Next Steps

  • Continue with plan to use InCommon Silver rather than UC Trust audit framework (continue "waiving" Waive UC Trust Basic audit requirement for minimum one more year
  • Await revised certification plan and guidelines due from InCommon in the next couple months
  • Review this revised plan at each campus and finalize resource requirements
  • ITLC as a group and at each campus will need to make determination on resource assignment and priority.
  • All campuses should begin the process of documenting current practices using the InCommon Silver framework.
  • Begin work to establish an audit framework that will make InCommon Silver audits as efficient as possible. The UC Trust workgroup recommended a multi-campus audit team be formed, with representation from internal audit Create audit team comprised of representatives from 3-5 campuses (. Karl Heins has volunteered to chair provide leadership and guidance to this group).

Proposed ITLC Action Items

  • Review InCommon Silver certification plans with your IAM lead and work with local campus constituents on resourcing the proposed implementation plans.
  • Work with UC Trust workgroup leadership to draft request to UC audit services to form a multi-campus review team.
  • Identify three campuses to begin audit process sometime before June 2012 (UC Trust workgroup agreed we should use the InCommon Silver audit framework even if we thought an audit might fail in the first round, given that the assurance framework is still new and no campus has yet tested it. We need an actual review to help tease out compliance issues).
  • Set timelines for putting together audit team beginning January 2012 and conducting first 1-3 audits beginning March 2012