Error!

Spaces has been migrated to the cloud. Please go to https://ucla-confluence.atlassian.net to update your space/s.

IT Services has migrated the content of spaces.ais.ucla.edu to Atlassian Confluence Cloud. Please visit https://ucla-confluence.atlassian.net to update your space/s. Spaces.ais.ucla.edu is now in read-only mode through July 31st, 2024
Child pages
  • Meeting Notes - 2011-08-25 Conference call

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • A new suggestion comes up that we do both audits (UC Trust Basic and InCommon Silver), with the intention of most likely failing the InCommon Silver audit.

coordinate audit process?
uc team approach for a faster time, but in the long run all the audit teams want experience

carl suggested cherry pick internal auditors and get them to volunteer
audit is a self assesment process and the auditors then review that process

is it feasible to hit these requirements as written?

something that's UC wide, how do we deal with this if we can't alone, hear what other people are doing.

dedra is wiiling to throw out some inquiries to others doign this as well, have a space where we have questions and soluntions for this.
there is an internal only area of wiki that is a starter for this

seems like a collaborative effort is good.
follow up w/ carl on collaboritve suggestion
talking points to ITLC for moving forward

schedule for doing audits for incommon silver even if we are going to fail
pass uc trust and fail the silver. going ahead with both audits
can we have a team that is familiar with both audits
we are going to ask auditors to use both sets of criteria? yes it would be a good idea

dedra heard that the incommon silver wasnt that more stringent but what is the real difference?

uctrust leadership

useful to have formal itlc/uc trust liason. that was sent to exec committee (the idea)
we talked about uc trust chair/co-chair - wait on this until we hear back from itlc on how to structure the subcommittees

  • There was some discussion of how to coordinate the audit process; perhaps having a collaborative effort would be the most effective. The audit itself is a self assessment process, and then auditors review that process. It would be ideal if we could ask auditors to use both set of criteria (for UC Trust Basic and InCommon Silver) when going through this process. Dedra is willing to make some inquiries to other campuses who are going through this same process. It is suggested that we should have a place on the wiki where we can post questions and solutions in reference to the audit process. Dedra will also make some talking points to the ITLC for moving this effort forward.

UC Trust leadership

  • During the previous meeting, it was brought up that it would be useful to have a formal ITLC/UC Trust liason. The idea was brought to the executive committee, and we are waiting to hear back.
  • We have also talked about a UC Trust Chair and Co-Chair - the workgroup agreed to wait until we hear back from the ITLC before proceeding.

System wide HR/Payroll decisionsystem wide HR/Payroll

the identity management licensing assocaited w/ this agrreement is only for employees and via the on demand service. those of us who have students, affiliates, alumni, etc. the licensing does NOT apply. local campuses would continue using their existing IAM system and intergrate this withte hs sytem wide HR tool.

...